Presuppositions , Truth Values , and Expressing Propositions ∗
نویسنده
چکیده
Philosophers like to talk about propositions. There are many reasons for this. Perhaps the most common is that philosophers are sometimes more interested in the content of a thought or utterance than in the particular sentence or utterance that might express it on some occasion. Propositions are offered as these contents. Like many philosophical notions, this one has been the subject of extensive debate. For instance, it has been challenged on the basis of Quinean queasiness about intensional objects, and Chomskian qualms about the explanatory value of truth-conditional semantics. These are foundational worries about the notion of proposition. But there is another kind of worry about propositions, which leads to the topic of this essay. The notion of proposition has been used to make some highly contentious philosophical claims. In particular, strong claims have been made by declaring that particular utterances, or whole classes of utterances, do not express propositions. Consider the following classes:
منابع مشابه
Minimal Polynomial Logic: Properties and Extensions
Minimal Polynomial Logic (MPL) is a generalisation of classical propositional logic which allows truth values in the continuous interval 0; 1] and in which propositions are represented by multi-variate polynomials. In previous work 7] we have introduced some properties of MPL and shown that it has two possible semantics: a) it can be considered as a logic for expressing, handling and computing ...
متن کاملTHE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM Minimal Polynomial Logic: Properties and Extensions
Minimal Polynomial Logic (MPL) is a generalisation of classical propositional logic which allows truth values in the continuous interval 0; 1] and in which propositions are represented by multi-variate polynomials. In previous work 7] we have introduced some properties of MPL and shown that it has two possible semantics: a) it can be considered as a logic for expressing, handling and computing ...
متن کاملLearning to Solve Complex Propositions: Does knowledge of truth-values bootstrap modal operators?
Evaluating complex propositions requires evaluating truthvalues and assigning modal operators. Previous research suggested that evaluating truth-values may be the key to assigning modal operators. This study placed 111 third and fifth grade children in one of three training conditions: no training, training truth-value assignment, and training truthvalue and modal operator assignment. The resul...
متن کاملTowards a Possibilistic Logic
In this paper, we investigate how linguistic information can be incorporated into classical propositional logic. First, we show that Zadeh’s extension principle can be justified and at the same time generalized by considerations about transformation of possibility measures. Using these results, we show how linguistic uncertainty about the truth value of a proposition leads to the introduction o...
متن کاملTruth, Belief and Certainty in Epistemic Logic
Standard logic tends to reduce propositions to their truth conditions. However propositions with the same truth conditions are not the contents of the same thoughts just as they are not the senses of synonymous sentences. I will first define a much finer criterion of propositional identity that takes into account predications that we make in expressing propositions. In my view, propositions hav...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004